Thoughts on Freud and Psycho-Analysis -- Part 2

Thoughts on Freud and Psycho-Analysis -- Part 2

From my previous post

Criticisms of Freudian Psychoanalysis

Despite its enduring impact, Freudian psychoanalysis has faced substantial criticism. Critics argue that Freud's theories lack empirical validation and rely heavily on clinical anecdotes rather than systematic research. The universality of Freud's concepts has also been questioned, with cultural and gender biases evident in his case studies and interpretations. 

Moreover, advancements in neuroscience and cognitive psychology have challenged Freud's emphasis on instinctual drives and the primacy of early childhood experiences. Critics suggest that psychoanalysis may not be suitable for treating severe mental disorders and point to alternative therapeutic approaches, such as cognitive-behavioral therapy, which prioritize symptom relief and evidence-based practices.

That has been what we have covered thus far. Now, on to a critique of Wendy Doniger's Use of Freudian Psychoanalysis.

A Note on Wendy Doniger's Use of Freudian Psychoanalysis and Critique

Prof. Wendy Doniger, a prominent scholar of Hinduism and comparative mythology, has employed Freudian psychoanalysis in her interpretations of Hindu texts and myths. Doniger's application of Freudian concepts, such as the Oedipus complex and sexual symbolism, to mythological figures like Shiva has sparked considerable debate.

I have critiqued Doniger's approach before, arguing that applying Freudian analysis to mythological characters is problematic.

My argument here is not that Freudian psycho-analysis is invalid in any specific cultural or historical context. It is also not that it is improper to apply to any specific context. For instance, if an individual does find a way to apply it to the study of mythological characters from Hinduism and Buddhism, that individual should not be prevented from engaging in such exploration – although I must say that it is hard to see how they could actually do it.

My point of contention is that the way Prof. Wendy Doniger has engaged in her analysis is unscientific and incorrect. Her research stands exposed as flawed, by virtue of this analysis, with the key point being that there is a major flaw in applying Freudian tools in the way Prof. Wendy Doniger has applied them. One of the major flaws in applying it to mythological characters is that they are not available for interview on a couch. This makes it impossible to verify claims, since the scientific basis of psychology involves administering inventories and tests to verify one's initial hunches. Therefore, the application of this methodology to mythological characters can be viewed as unscientific.

I would like to assert that Freudian psychology's reliance on clinical observation and Western cultural norms may overlook the symbolic and multifaceted meanings embedded within Hindu myths. Moreover, I would like to highlight that there are concerns about cultural sensitivity and the potential for misinterpretation when imposing Western psychological frameworks onto non-Western cultural narratives.

Conclusion

Freudian psychoanalysis remains a cornerstone of psychological theory, offering valuable insights into the complexities of human behavior and the unconscious mind. However, its application beyond clinical settings and Western cultural contexts requires careful consideration and critique.

Wendy Doniger's use of Freudian psychoanalysis in interpreting Hindu myths underscores the challenges of applying Western theories to diverse cultural narratives. Critics like Rajiv Malhotra argue that such applications risk oversimplification and misrepresentation of complex cultural symbols and meanings.

As psychology continues to evolve, incorporating diverse perspectives and methodologies will be essential for enriching our understanding of human experience across cultures. Freudian psychoanalysis, while influential, must be adapted and critically examined to remain relevant in contemporary psychological and cultural studies.

References

• Freud, S. (1900). The Interpretation of Dreams. Basic Books.
• Laplanche, J., & Pontalis, J. B. (1973). The Language of Psycho-Analysis. Karnac Books.
• Doniger, W. (1980). The Hindus: An Alternative History. Penguin Books.